Mysterious IPCC Expertise
The IPCC publishes the citizenship and gender of its authors – but says nothing about their scientific expertise.
By Donna LaFramboise
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) claims to be a scientific organization. But it’s really a political one.
An obvious tell is how it describes its personnel. In the old days, IPCC reports listed people according to their role and their country. Matters have improved since then.
Today, the IPCC gives us six data points about its personnel rather than three. A webpage associated with its latest report tells us each individual’s:
- name
- IPCC role (coordinating lead author, lead author, review editor)
- gender
- country of residence
- citizenship
- institutional affiliation
But this only looks like progress. In the real world, the additional info is irrelevant. Science doesn’t care where someone lives or what citizenship they hold. Science doesn’t care if they’re a man or a woman.
If the IPCC is a panel of experts, the critical issue is: What is each of these people an expert in? More than 30 years after its founding, the IPCC still thinks it doesn’t need to talk about this.
For the UN bureaucrats who run the show, some things are important. Some are not. The nature of an author’s scientific expertise clearly isn’t a burning issue. But lots of attention is being paid to checking diversity boxes.
LINKS:
The Delinquent Teenager Who Was Mistaken for the World’s Top Climate Expert Donna Laframboise |
- my previous IPCC commentary:
- IPCC Embraces Geographic Quotas
- IPCC Experts Lack Scientific Credibility
- The IPCC’s Fake Review Editor
- The IPCC’s Cynical Ploy
- The Last Chance Climate Saloon
- IPCC Pretends the Scientific Publishing Crisis Doesn’t Exist
- BBC Ignores Widely Publicized IPCC Problems
- Where’s the Science at the IPCC?
- 3 Things Scientists Need to Know About the IPCC
- US Scientific Integrity Rules Repudiate the UN Climate Process
- Cogs in the Climate Machine