New York Times: ‘U.S. seeking climate deal that would skirt Senate’
'Under the Constitution, a president may enter into a legally binding treaty only if it is approved by a two-thirds majority of the Senate.
To sidestep that requirement, President Obama’s climate negotiators are devising what they call a “politically binding” deal that would “name and shame” countries into cutting their emissions...American negotiators are instead homing in on a hybrid agreement — a proposal to blend legally binding conditions from an existing 1992 treaty with new voluntary pledges. The mix would create a deal that would update the treaty, and thus, negotiators say, not require a new vote of ratification.v
By: Marc Morano - Climate DepotAugust 26, 2014 6:54 PM with 0 comments
Wednesday’s International New York Times – “U.S. seeking climate deal that would skirt Senate” #tomorrowspaperstoday http://twitter.com/suttonnick/status/504357255245230080/photo/1
https://twitter.com/suttonnick/status/504357255245230080
Recent Articles
- Los Angeles International Airport Loses Power For an Hour Showing the Limits of an All-Electric Future
- Watch: Greenpeace co-founder Dr. Patrick Moore on why environmental activists trying to save whales from Big Wind
- Everything that needs electricity is made with oil
- Climate Hysteria & Groupthink From Billionaires Who Want Your Money To Save The World
- Biden Treasury Sec. Yellen stands in front of straw hut telling African farmers they can fight climate change
- UK Guardian: US transition to electric cars threatens environmental havoc By 2050 & Climate Temperature Goals – ‘Electric vehicles could require huge amounts of lithium’ mining
- Poll: Democratic voters cheer on gas stove ban: Majority of Dems support a natural gas ban, most GOP & Independents opposed or undecided
- Massive Peer-Reviewed Mask Study Shows ‘Little To No Difference’ In Preventing COVID, Flu Infection
- Biden admin relents, expected to approve oil drilling permits in Alaska
- The Billionaires Behind The Gas Stove Bans: The hypocrisy of those funding anti-hydrocarbon campaigns
- Wyoming Wind Projects Pose ‘Profoundly Dangerous’ Threat To Golden Eagles
- Energy Reset: UK Paying Britons Not to Use Electricity
- Electric Vehicles Are an Ideologically Driven Economic Misadventure
- Physicist: Mainstream Media Jump on ‘Mistaken Belief’ That Extreme Weather Caused by Climate Change – ‘Actual data reveals…downward’ trend
- Meet the Unstable Climate Scientist Biden Tapped to Serve on His Intelligence Board – Kim Cobb experienced an ‘acute mental health crisis’ & ‘could not get out of bed’ after Trump’s win in 2016
- We’re saved! GOP announces ‘that addressing climate change is absolutely a prime priority’ – ‘Wants to appease climate-conscious voters & powerful business interests’
- Geologist: ‘The records written in the rocks’ reveal global cooling is due
- American Library Association gives grants to libraries ‘to help educate patrons on the climate crisis’
- Study: Cost to Fuel Electric Vehicles Is Now Higher Than Gas-Powered Cars in U.S.
- Why Environmentalists May Make This Whale Species Extinct – Green groups throw their once-sacred ‘precautionary principle’ to the wind(mills)