A few PR Giants won’t help “deniers of climate change” (but 70% of PR giants will)
The most dangerous thing is a skeptic that can be heard. If only climate activists had evidence, they wouldn’t need to use social censure, instead of reasoned arguments. But it was never about the science, and always about PR. If skeptical arguments weren’t so powerful, the fans of Climate Change TM wouldn’t be going out of their way to try to silence skeptics. This article itself is spun. They frame the message to avoid saying that only 28% of PR Firms agreed climate change was a threat or that 60% of PR firms ignored them completely. They only name five PR groups, and at least one (WPP) is a conglomerate of 150 firms which “will all make their own decisions”. So much for that. The Guardian, of course, gullibly soaks up the meme. Fiona Harvey asks no hard questions. World’s top PR companies rule out working with climate deniers Ten firms say they will not represent clients that deny man-made climate change or seek to block emisson-reducing regulations Since no one actually denies the climate changes, this is a bit like refusing to work with Klingons. Though fans of Climate Change TM speak in Spin-English and in that […]Rating: 10.0/10 (2 votes cast)
