Search
Close this search box.

‘IPCC was not right’: Warmists Frame & Stone’s claims ignore main IPCC predictions — ‘Why did Nature publish this strawman letter? ‘Effort in selective focus, logical fallacies, & circular reasoning’

Frame and Stone themselves say the IPCC models didn’t include important forcings, and may have been “right” by accident. Why did Nature publish this strawman letter? It’s an award-winning effort in selective focus, logical fallacies, and circular reasoning to be sure, but does it advance our understanding of the natural world? Not so. Frame and Stone have produced a Letter to Nature saying that 3 is a lot like 6 (they are both larger than zero). If you ignore the Summary for Policymakers, pick a line […]Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Share: