Search
Close this search box.

Penn State investigation cited Mann’s ‘level of success in proposing research and obtaining funding’ as some sort of proof that he was meeting the ‘highest standards’

Climate Depot’s Executive Editor Marc Morano on Penn State’s inquiry into Michael Mann:

‘This is not surprising that Mann’s own university circled the wagons and narrowed the focus of its own investigation to declare him ethical.

‘The fact that the investigation cited Mann’s ‘level of success in proposing research and obtaining funding’ as some sort of proof that he was meeting the ‘highest standards’, tells you that Mann is considered a sacred funding cash cow. At the height of his financial career, similar sentiments could have been said about Bernie Madoff.

Mann has become the posterboy of the corrupt and disgraced climate science echo chamber. No university whitewash investigation will change that simple reality.’

Flashback Dec. 2009: Penn State’s announcement of its investigation ‘is so complimentary to Mann, it almost reads like the press release of the verdict, published prematurely’

MIT’s Richard Lindzen on Mann: ‘Penn State has clearly demonstrated that it is incapable of monitoring violations of scientific standards of behavior internally’

Physicist Lubos Motl: ‘Penn State officially joins Michael Mann’s scam…remembered as a black day in its history’ (Mann email: mann@[email protected]) — Mann ‘cleared’ of research misconduct even though explicit proofs of his misconduct are available to the whole world’

Climate Depot’s FactSheet on Mann’s Various ‘Hockey Stick’ Creations

Share: